GERRY'S RESPONSE
_______________________
.Some comments on your website. BTW, I found it in a search for
Harley emblems!
Your premise is that image and sound must be based on, or
somehow supported by performance. One has no relation whatsoever with the other.
Where do you base this claim? You persist, after constructing this straw man, to beat him
senseless. I know of many icons, celebrities, "in " places or activities
that have followers because of some indefinable quality of presence
or image. People and things I would not devote a moments thought or a line of
type to have legions of followers. It's not my place to put some yardstick I feel
important against something just to knock what others may legitimately enjoy. And if I
did, they could be correct in saying I was out of the loop, out of touch, or
just plain jealous of whatever I was knocking.
I' ve been around for 52 years and have ridden many bikes, dirt
and street. I was probably racing flat track and hill climbs before you were born. I had
a 90cc Bridgestone street bike, ( that required mixing oil and gas manually!) in
1967, then moved up to plenty of Kawasakis, Triumphs and BMWs, before the
Harley Wide Glide and Yamaha Blaster I now own. I don't knock Japanese
bikes, they're fine bikes but I don't think they're meant to last the long haul. A friend
services Hondas and Harleys, ( Wild Willy in Edgewood, MD), and even though his specialty
is the Gold Wing, he will tell you that Honda changes it's engine so much year to year
that bikes 5 years old are very difficult to get good spare parts for. He has had up to 3
water pumps for 1998 Gold Wings bad off the shelf. Honda practically tells him and the
local Gold Wing Club that 1998 and 1997 Gold Wings are TOO OLD to keep up and
should be replaced! My 96 Wide Glide has never needed repair but common PM parts are still
available and Willie can get anything he wants for Evo engines and earlier. Like he says,
An Evo engine was pretty much the same, just as the 88 engine has stayed about the same.
Sure, Harley may not be cutting edge, but when
you can have a Harley over 15 years old hold it's price and
still be easily serviced long after it's Japanese competition is asking you to finance at
least two or more new bikes, I don't see where your carping about Harley's "high
price" springs.
Two people want a large touring bike:
The Harley can be bought for about 19 k. Before you drive it off
the floor, you or the dealer can sell it for more than the price you ordered it at!
Unless you wrap that bike around some tree, you could keep it 5 years and sell it
for just about what you paid for it and walk away. Depending on the model you bought and
the time of year you sell, you can often do better than that original cost!
The same sized Honda or Yamaha can be put on the road for about
15 k. When you start it up and out the door you could sell it for about 13 k. Five years
later, after telling a few thousand people that, "No, it's not a Harley. But yes, I
know, it looks like one", he might get 7 k for it.
Overpriced? You have to explain that claim. The Harley rider
didn't spend a single cent. Essentially, he borrowed a bike from the dealer for those
years. The jap bike rider lost money whether he continues riding or not.
There is a very real reason why the Harley logo is proudly
displayed on the tank and Honda and Yamaha to be absent from so many of theirs.
Your representation of Harley riders is a simple lie. Most
Harley riders do not wear German helmets or nazi symbols. I belong to a group of 650
plus and not one looks like this. You state they do as a fact when you MUST know it
to be untrue.
It's very disingenuous to call Harley riders every name
imaginable, (chimpanzee clits?), and then ask those that respond to your rants
to do so in a "civil" manner. Also, after using the phrase " half my brain
tied behind my back", you ask others to be more original in their correspondence!
You seem to feel we are rather low in IQ. We may
have trouble handling your long sentences. Let's try something simple:
Take the Mensa test available on the internet. I'll trust
your honesty in your response to me. It is 30 minutes long. If you get about 20
of a possible 30 correct on that test you may be eligible for Mensa
membership. I turned down Mensa. Pompous types, you'd be at home with them. If
you get that far I can test you for the International High IQ Society. Our membership is
limited to the upper 5% IQ range. It should be simple for you. I'm a simple Harley rider,
yet, I can run instrumentation and medical processes that most people could not guess at
and am at the upper 3 % in IQ in logic and problem solving. Considering your endless
rant about the low IQ we Harley owners possess, your capacities must be staggering.
You have a big mouth. Back it up. I await the first
results. If you are correct, at all, in anything you wrote, I have told
my friends you must certainly test in the upper one per-cent, well past me.
GGardiner
_________________
To which I replied
_________________
.Some comments on your website. BTW, I found it in a search for
Harley emblems!
How many Harley emblems do you really need, Gerry? Did the old, rusty ones finally rattle loose and
fall off your bike? Perhaps you just really
feel the incessant need to display to everyone that you own the biggest piece of junk made
by man, and to do so by plastering the all too familiar bar and shield logo on everything
that you own.
Your premise is that image and sound must be based on, or
somehow supported by performance. One has no
relation whatsoever with the other.
Image and sound, not based upon
performance, are meaningless, Gerry.
For instance: if I dress up and look like a
jet fighter pilot, if I talk and sound like a jet fighter pilot, but if
I dont know the first damn thing about how to actually fly a jet
fighter or anything about air to air combat, then you see where image and sound,
not based upon performance, are meaningless. Unless
of course, you are just posing...
The same can be said for a Harley Davidson motorcycle. It tries to look tough but it runs like a neutered
water buffalo, it handles like a pregnant yak and it sounds like a constipated elephant. It is also built using Fred Flintstone era
technology.
Where do you base this claim?
Where do I base this claim? You obviously dont understand very much about
motorcycles or technology, do you? I have had
a saying for years now, Gerry;
There is a big difference between being fast and powerful,
or just being loud and annoying.
What that means is that those of you who like to brag about
owning a real motorcycle are annoying to those of us who do. Image is a byproduct of design and design is a byproduct
of performance. If you tune for power, sound
will naturally follow. If you tune for sound,
you are inherently doing nothing for power. That
is elementary physics and mechanics. Musical
instruments are tuned for sound, motorcycles are not, or at least REAL motorcycles are
not. When was the last time that any manufacturer won a world series motorcycle race
because their bikes looked and sounded better than every other bike on the field?
Just
because you play your music really loud doesnt necessarily mean that you are a rock
star, it just means you know how to operate a volume knob on a stereo. With that in mind, rattling windows and making lots
of noise doesnt equal raw power, brute performance, or riding skill, it just means
that you know how to grab some throttle on an outdated piece of junk, an act that only
impresses knuckle dragging hill scoggins. The
rest of us real motorcyclists know the Harley sound for what it truly is;
trendy suburban noise, sold at a stop your heart premium.
A modern (and I use that term modern very
loosely) EVO engine displaces somewhat over one point three cubic liters (1300 plus CCs)
in size yet manages to barely cough and wheeze out only a little over fifty-something
asthmatic horsepower. Why is that, Gerry? Is that staggering performance to displacement
figure achieved due to all of the cutting edge design and high technology that Harley
embraces or is it because the Motor Company is and has been stagnant for over three
decades now? Could it be that Milwaukee is
content to sell their products based on sound and image alone? Probably, because
they dont know the first thing about performance or how to create such a trait in
any of their ancient products.
You know my opinion on the matter.
Harley produces roughly one horsepower per twenty-one or
twenty-two CCs of displacement, fuzzy math being used and the exact figure will vary
somewhat depending on application. Do you
think that is impressive? If you do, then you
can count yourself among the herd of easily wowed scoggins that spend a great amount of
time pondering if the little light actually stays on or not when the door to the
refrigerator is closed.
Japan has shown consistently that it can build anywhere from two
to four times the horsepower per liter than America can, or in other words, to do the same
job with half or even a third of the displacement, all using technology. Thats not advanced technology, thats
modern technology. The cutting edge stuff
pushes the envelope even further beyond Milwaukees ability to reach and makes most
scoggins run around spastically on brain overload, bumping into each other and turning
green when they inadvertently swallow their chewing tobacco.
The Japanese motors impress me, Gerry.
They do far more with far less and they dont make as much
noise when they are doing it.
You persist, after constructing this straw man, to beat
him senseless. I know of many icons, celebrities, "in " places or
activities that have followers because of some indefinable quality of
presence or image. People and things I would not devote a moments thought or a
line of type to have legions of followers.
Gerry, you have just described what
it is like to own a Harley! It is something
that the crowd does not because it is inherently a monumental good thing, but because it's
the trendy thing to do. People when present in
large numbers are never much of an environment for truly deep or original thinking.
Most groups tend to follow the more beaten path rather than strike out on their own, and
they tend to do this without very much fore-thought being given to the matter at hand. Another saying you should learn to remember
is:
If you want to go nowhere fast, just follow the
crowd.
Harley lives off of that fact, and makes a nice profit in doing so. Owning a Harley is an admission of your own
codependence on a corporation to provide you with justification for your own existence as
well as basic instruction on how you should act, how you should dress, and what products
you should buy to fill your life with. You
have to be as smart or smarter than what you own. It
takes no brains to own or work on a Harley, therefore
It's not my place to put some yardstick I feel important
against something just to knock what others may legitimately enjoy. And if I did,
they could be correct in saying I was out of the loop, out of touch, or just
plain jealous of whatever I was knocking.
Yardstick, dipstick, standardized test, anal probe, urine
sample, regardless of whatever form of accepted measurement that we, as a society, use to
gauge someones intelligence, the process itself is a concept that has long been
applied by society to judge who is worthy and who is not. This simple process has
been going on for as long as recorded history. Society
has always, in some form or the other, tested people to see who deserves what and who will
fill certain slots in the social order, all based upon what they can provide to society in
turn. Society tests its members, in a variety
of ways, to see who will build the rockets, who will pilot those rockets, and who will
have to clean up the launch pad after all the others have gone home for the day.
Gerry,
Im sorry that you feel that it isnt your place to stand up and point out what
is right and wrong, or what is smart and dumb. That
is the problem with todays society, no one has the spine to stand up and point out
when other people are stupid or wrong. I
believe that is not only every educated human beings inherent right, but also
their inherent duty.
I've been around for 52 years and have ridden many bikes,
dirt and street. I was probably racing flat track and hill climbs before you were born. I
had a 90cc Bridgestone street bike, ( that required mixing oil and gas
manually!) in 1967, then moved up to plenty of Kawasakis, Triumphs and
BMWs, before the Harley Wide Glide and Yamaha Blaster I now own.
Well, Im 34 years old, and Ive been riding since I
was ten, so thats about two and a half decades of being in the saddle. Ive ridden a lot of bikes, all different
types, all different models including motor scooters, mopeds, off road dirt bikes, three
wheelers, four wheelers, import cruisers, import standards, import sport bikes, import
sport tourers, Harleys, Guzzis, a pair of Triumphs, a Duc, and the odd BMW when chance
permitted. I have to honestly say that the
most disappointing motorcycle I ever rode was a Harley simply because it did not
live up to any of its reputation, except in price and dealer attitude.
Ive been a devoted disciple of advanced technology ever
since I first saw and heard a compact Honda V-four engine.
My 1984 Honda VF500F Interceptor had over 80,000 miles on it when I traded it in
for a 1993 Honda VFR750F and the 84 never gave me any trouble. Fill it with gas, do routine maintenance, check
and change the fluids, turn the ignition and ride it forever. The VF500F was in near perfect condition when I
traded it in, well maintained, it was just obsolete in the styling department and of
course, the new VFR750F was pure poetry in motion with its technologically advanced 750cc
liquid cooled, 16 valve gear driven DOHC V-four engine.
The new generation of V-four power plant, evolved from the first generation VFR,
which had itself evolved from the same generation VF series, sang with a voice that no
Harley could ever match. It transcended simple mechanical harmony and bordered on
angelic in tone.
To show you how much technology had advanced in 9 years, the
then modern 1993 750cc power plant made twice the power of Honda's old first generation
three quarter liter V-four and almost three times the power of the 9 year old 500cc V-four
power plant. That is technological evolution.
That is what happens when you have to be better than your competitor, not just sell
more T-shirts and leather jackets than they do.
When was the last time that Harley Davidson took one of their
engines and tripled the power in a decade or less? Never. And they wont ever do it, simply because they
dont know how to, and also because they cant.
They just arent that smart, Gerry and they never will be. Why?
Because they aren't competitive. Competition breeds technological evolution.
Take away the competitiveness, and you lose the need for technology.
I don't knock Japanese bikes, they're fine bikes but I
don't think they're meant to last the long haul. A
friend services Hondas and Harleys, ( Wild Willy in Edgewood, MD), and even though his
specialty is the Gold Wing, he will tell you that Honda changes it's engine so much year
to year that bikes 5 years old are very difficult to get good spare parts for.
What do you mean not meant to last the long haul?
I just clearly said that my 84 Honda VF500F Interceptor
had over 80,000 miles on it when I traded it in and it ran like it was brand new at 9
years of age! The only reason I traded it in
is that the nine year newer VFR750F took my heart strings the same way, if not more, than
the 84 VF500F had done when I first saw it parked at the local college. The reason that Honda changes its engine is that it
isnt happy to rest on its ass and be satisfied with the bare minimum engine required
to move its cycles around. And since Honda
tunes its motors for power, instead of sound, the motors will constantly evolve. Honda understands that in the REAL world, that it
is technology which keeps it competitive with its competitors, not how much tacky crap
they can slather their logo on. Honda is
always innovative, always looking at how to improve their models, their engines, their
suspensions, their power trains and the forms which house those designs.
Thats called P-R-O-G-R-E-S-S, Gerry.
It is an integral part of any forward moving civilization.
Progress is a tasty recipe requiring equal parts of ingenuity,
forward thinking, research, design, and the implementation of new technology all baked in
a think tank, mixed with cutting edge manufacturing capacity, served fresh each year and
sold in volume to give a deep discount to the end user.
That is why Honda serves up improvements and new designs year after year,
while Harley merely serves the same old stale old pile of tepid dog shit decade after
decade.
Progress does not come without some cost, namely you lose the
ability to be complacent. Complacency is the
perfect breeding ground for non-competitiveness. For
Honda, complacency is not acceptable. For Harley, it is considered the home team
advantage.
He has had up to 3 water pumps for 1998 Gold Wings bad off
the shelf. Honda practically tells him and the local Gold Wing Club that 1998 and 1997
Gold Wings are TOO OLD to keep up and should be replaced! My 96 Wide Glide has
never needed repair but common PM parts are still available and Willie can get anything he
wants for Evo engines and earlier. Like he says, An Evo engine was pretty much the same,
just as the 88 engine has stayed about the same.
Well, I can match your Honda horror
stories with Harley horror stories of parts and quality concerns probably two or three to
one. Why does Willy have so many parts
available for Harleys? Harley is stagnant,
Gerry. Your friend Willie can get anything for
any Harley because the motors havent changed (or advanced) in decades, just like the
designs of the bikes. A part for a 1982
Sportster will probably fit on a 2002 Sportster, but I doubt that anything from a 1983
Honda 750cc engine will fit on a 2003 Honda 750cc engine.
Harley Davidson only produces V-twins. Sure they have a few different sizes, some with
more cams and valves than the others, and some even have optional fuel injection. But they are all V-twins in a limited
range of displacements, all breathe through Japanese carburetors, all are shoved into
dated frames that are almost as old as the design of the motors. Honda, on the other hand, produces single
cylinders, twin cylinders, V-twins, V-fours, inline fours, and six cylinders, in sizes
ranging from a few CCs up to well over 1.3 liters. Honda builds all types of
engines, from car and truck engines, to motorcycle engines, and even power generators.
When was the last time you saw a Harley Davidson electrical
generator? I guess there's not much of a market for an auxillary power generator
that weighs 400 pounds, had an 80db exhaust note, had to be kick started, crank it, shakes
your whole house to the foundation, rattles like a can of loose bolts when it runs,
produces an incredible 60 watts of power and costs $6,000, no matter how many letters of
the alphabet you assign to the name or how many tassels you hang from the handlebars and
the kick starter.
Harleys pretty much all come from just a few old parts bins in
Milwaukee. The inbred scoggins stamp out the
same tired old parts 24 hours a day, fill the huge bins, then occasionally rearrange the
parts in random order until they get something that looks in passing like the bike that
their grandpappy used to ride. Spray paint it
a slightly different color, throw in a new set of wheels, a pin stripe or two, tack on two
more letters of the alphabet, and add three grand to the price. Its like a redneck version of Legos, only
with really bad country music, home-made moonshine and rampant sister swapping.
No matter how you look at any Harley engine, they are still the
same, tired old farm irrigation pump turned lackluster motorcycle engine that they were at
the beginning of the 20th century. Harley
is not an engine for the 21st century. Why would you need a lot of different parts
when the very same parts from twenty years ago still fit the engine today?
Think, Gerry. Think.
Let's use some circular logic here: Harley is stagnant. Stagnant is
bad. Therefore Harley is bad.
Sure, Harley may not be cutting edge, but when you can
have a Harley over 15 years old hold it's price and still be easily serviced long after
it's Japanese competition is asking you to finance at least two or more new bikes, I don't
see where your carping about Harley's "high price" springs.
My argument, again, Gerry, is that
Harley is an outdated design that is simply copied and reproduced over and over again,
year after year, by Milwaukee. It has no
innovation, no forward thinking, no evolution and why should it? A Harley is based on image and sound only, each of
which require only duplication, not innovation. If
the design of a Harley were based on any kind of measurable performance, it would require
a large dose of innovation to be introduced to the design, a commodity that Milwaukee
apparently has to import directly from Porsche of Germany.
In case you are still clueless about HD, most of what you pay for when you buy the
best that Milwaukee can offer is the name and the reputation (be that as it may), not the
bike itself. Harleys retain their high resale
price not because they are good bikes, or even passable examples of classic motorcycles,
but because they are Harleys, and stupid, gullible people still tend to think
that anything made by Harley is the greatest bike in the world.
Oh! Good. I see that you have presented to me an interesting
example of sheer fiscal ignorance, so lets review that now, shall we?
Two people want a large touring bike. The Harley can be bought for about 19 k. Before you
drive it off the floor, you or the dealer can sell it for more than the price you ordered
it at! Unless you wrap that bike around some tree, you could keep it 5 years and
sell it for just about what you paid for it and walk away. Depending on the model you
bought and the time of year you sell, you can often do better than that original
cost!
Bwahahahahaha! Oh, what ridiculously laughable nonsense! Come away, Gerry.
Let us have you deprogrammed before it is too late!
If a Harley is worth so much more money than what you
are paying for it, Gerry, then why isnt the dealer selling it for more? Wouldnt it make sense to sell something for
the price which it was worth, if it was really worth that much to begin with? What planet do you live on, Gerry? It sure isnt Earth because down here on
Earth, we have something called economics, which respond to market
fluctuations and conditions and this "economics" is driven by something in turn
called logic.
In other words, if the dealer can sell the bike for more than
you are about to pay for it, then why isnt he? Because life and economics, as
you have described them, simply do not work the way that you have describe them. Period.
In the real world, the Harley that you are intending to buy will
be sold to you at the price that it is currently worth, which is called market
value. What someone is willing to pay
for the Harley is perceived value.
If a Harley is really so more valuable than what you are paying
for it, then why is the dealer deep discounting it to you instead of selling it at this
make-believe premium which you suggest? If Joe
Scoggin is waiting outside in the parking lot and will pay you more for your bike than you
are going to pay the dealer, then why isnt the dealer getting Joe Scoggin to come in
and buy the bike to begin with and skip over you completely?
What you propose just doesnt make a lot of financial sense, Gerry, but then
that is the kind of silly lemming logic that people like you tell me over and over again
in order to validate their fiscal ignorance and the fact that they not only dont
know a whole hell of a lot about motorcycles, but that they also dont know a whole
hell of a lot about money either.
Theres a simple rule of business that we have in the real
world, Gerry, its called the law of supply and demand. This basically states that the more demand there is
for a particular item, then the more the price will rise in direct proportion to the
supply of that item. The law of supply and
demand completely invalidates the theory that you have presented to me on this
make-believe market value of a Harley. If a
Harley is worth more than what you are asked to pay for it, then the Harley will sell for
that greater price, there on the showroom floor, until such time that the market is
saturated with Harleys and people become unwilling to pay the higher price, at which time
price will adjust itself to match supply. As
more and more bikes sit on the showroom floor, waiting to be purchased, the price will
come down to a favorable price to entice Joe Scoggin to walk in and ride out. As
less people buy the product, the more product will become available, and the price will
fall to entice the customers to buy the product. That
is how business works, Gerry. Not the other
way around.
Let me put it simply.
If a Harley can be sold for $24,000 cash when it is brand new,
anywhere in the world, then you are not going to walk into a dealer and pay $19,000 cash
for a brand new Harley. You will pay $24,000
cash for that Harley.
Sorry to burst your unrealistic concepts of economics. If the world truly worked the way you think
it does, I would be making partners with a banker tomorrow to get a loan to buy
out the local Harley Davidson dealerships stock, roll it out into the parking lot
outside, and sell it for a 20% or higher profit margin to all of these make-believe
scoggins which you think are just waiting outside to fully reimburse you and reward you on
top of that for your trouble. If I could find
one of these scoggins for every bike in the showroom, I could pay back my loan, and pocket
about $200,000 all for an afternoons work of dealing with idiots and signing
paperwork until I acquired carpal tunnel syndrome.
I guess these scoggins with the deep pockets could
exist, after all, the saying one mans trash is another mans
treasure had to originate somewhere. I
think Harley coined that particular phrase myself. It
would go far to explaining their marketing practices and their product, if not their
corporate mission statement.
The same sized Honda or Yamaha can be put on the road for
about 15 k. When you start it up and out the door you could sell it for about 13 k. Five
years later, after telling a few thousand people that, "No, it's not a Harley. But
yes, I know, it looks like one", he might get 7 k for it.
As you have just shown, most people are completely ignorant
about motorcycles in general, and Harley depends on that fact to turn a profit as well as
survive. People recognize the Harley logo, but
they often dont have a clue that the bike is anything other than a
Harley or a rice burner. Most
people who would ask if a bike was a Harley without looking it over closely are the
ignorant kind of stumpfucks that keep Harley Davidson in business to begin with.
As John Gullato once said so eloquently in an email conversation
which we had; "Sure, nine out of ten people
would want a Harley if you asked them, but then again, nine of ten people don't know shit
about bikes."
Which only goes to reinforce my argument that Harleys are not
bought by either knowledgeable people or smart people.
They are bought by people who want to make a statement about their status in
life, who want to make an entrance when they appear, who want to pose and show, rather
than ride.
Five years down the road? A
lot happens in Japan in five years, Gerry, if not the rest of the world but almost nothing
at all happens in Milwaukee. You might get
some new T-shirts, a few more household items with the bar and shield logo on them, or
another trendy Harley boutique opening up in a mall somewhere, but thats about it. In our information based society, computers become
obsolete in three years, some models faster than that.
Five years is an eternity in the high technology race, and to any corporation who
depends on technological superiority to keep them competitive in the marketplace.
However, five years is but a drop in the bucket for Milwaukee.
If Harley based their motorcycles on any kind of
performance or technology, and made a genuine effort to at least keep up
with the rest of the world, if not compete directly, then their bikes would look a lot
different than they do now. They would be lighter, faster, cheaper, and more
dependable. They would have a sound that was naturally generated from their engine
designs, not artificially stimulated as the main selling point. The fact is, Harley
is not a motorcycle because it does not keep up with the times.
Harley is not competitive.
Harley is not modern. Harley
is image and sound, without performance.
Your question is why would someone want to get rid of a Japanese
bike in five years while people hold onto Harleys for years, even decades after that?
Simple.
Innovation.
The reason why Japanese bikes are disposable,
if that term can be used, is because five years later, the new version of that
very same import bike will be far superior to the now five year old model, and who wants
to pay high dollar for something that is outdated (besides those who would buy a Harley, I
mean)? I would a lot rather spend $24,000 over
a period of six to ten years and get three different Suzuki GSX-R models, each more
powerful, lighter, better handling, and more advanced than the model before, than I would
spend $24,000 and be stuck with one lackluster Milwaukee vibrator for ten years, with no
hope in ten or fifteen years of seeing any technological innovation or change. If you aren't into sportbikes, then for the price of your average Harley, I can afford to pick and
choose several different brands of import and own multiple types of bikes. I could
have a cruiser, a sportbike, and a standard or tour bike, or I could have just one rather
bland, overrated domestic model.
Stagnation.
If you have the same product, itself identically produced year
after year, technologically stagnant, never changing, never evolving, selling on sound and
image alone, yeah, you can get the same price for this years model as you did for a
model from ten years ago, because they are functionally and technologically the same and
their price is driven more by artificially inflated market hype than by real, actual
worth. Gerry, what is the difference between a
1982 Harley Davidson and a 2002 Harley Davidson?
The real difference?
Not much, if any, and that is why a 1982 HD and a 2002 HD hold
their prices comparably. With very little
difference, hell, as long as it says Harley on the side, some three tooth hill
scoggin is going to be proud to have it parked next to his mobile home in the trailer
park, and if they have to get a fourth mortgage on the trailer to do it, no problem,
because its a Harley and they arent going to ride no Jap crap, but
theyll roll their Harley up in the back of their Toyota Tacoma pickup truck when it
breaks down.
Harley has not only made a roaring success out of marketing the
same design and technology year after year to stupid people, but apparently they have
tricked these people into believing that the older, more outdated a Harley is, the more
valuable it is! The icing on the cake is, of course, the misconception that you can
buy a Harley, ride it for five years, rack up 100,000 miles on it, and then sell it for
what you paid for it.
I love that!
Try to do that with a toaster, or a VCR, or a computer. People would laugh at you if you tried. But Milwaukee isnt selling to any really
smart people, now are they? No. Milwaukee is selling prepackaged ignorance at a
premium and making a profit off of it! Who
says stupid people are bad for society? They
certainly arent bad for the economy! I
mean, face it, we had people who bought PET ROCKS in the 70s. That was your generation, Gerry. Heres a big clue. Rocks are free.
No one owns a rock, except maybe God and He put enough down here
that everyone could have one, or two, or a dozen, in any size, shape, or color you want. Hell, you can come to my house and adopt as many as
your pockets can hold, I wont charge you a dime.
Think about it. Someone sold someone else a pet rock.
Knowing that there are people out there, in YOUR generation, who
once paid someone else good, hard earned money for a small ROCK, some yellow STRAW, a
small set of CARE AND FEEDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR YOUR PET ROCK, and a small cardboard BOX to
keep your rock in
then I can really understand Harleys target market and what
a rich, rich vein it is that they have tapped into, a vein rich in ignorance and easily
disposable income.
Overpriced? You have to explain that claim. The Harley
rider didn't spend a single cent. Essentially, he borrowed a bike from the dealer for
those years. The jap bike rider lost money whether he continues riding or not.
The Harley rider didn't spend a single cent.
Essentially, he borrowed a bike from the dealer for those years?!?!
(insert stern look of disapproving incredulity here mixed with a
slow shake of the head expressing humorous disbelief at your resolute ignorance)
Gerry! Please
tell me that you are not that financially
naïve. What laughable nonsense economics you
espouse! If a Harley is so valuable, if it
sells for so much profit, why would a dealer let someone borrow a bike for all
those years? So, in essence, what you are
saying is that the Harley dealer just lets people ride out of the dealership for free,
with a big old personal IOU for $19k? He just
borrowed the bike in the long run. Using
your logic, anyone could go into a Harley dealership, pick out a bike, and when the dealer
said Will that be cash or charge? the new owner says Ill let you
know when I bring it back in five years and sell it back to you for this exact price, with
a 100,000 miles worth of wear and tear on it.
Bwahahahahahaha!
Oh, that is just so not happening, Gerry. Tell me, now really, did you graduate from the
DeVry Business Institute or what? None of you
scooter scoggins know the first thing about economics or business, which simply goes to
prove my point that if you can afford a Harley, then you might not be smart enough to own
anything else. Hell, if you knew anything
about money or motorcycles, then you wouldnt be riding a Harley in the first place,
now would you?
Where do you think the original nineteen thousand dollars
comes from, Gerry?
Did some scoggin just go out and pluck it off of the money tree
in the backyard? Nineteen grand is a whole
hell of a lot of money to a middle class American family, the so called real men and women
which Harley says it represents. Its
a lot of money to me and I know that, given the brain that God graced me with, Im
not going to waste nineteen grand on an outdated piece of junk like a Harley Davidson,
just to say that I ride the same bike that Ken and Barbie do. Hell, I winced when I had to pay fifty cents on
the dollar for an ultra low mileage, two year old Chevy LT edition 4x4 Blazer with all the
options that was a program car at the local dealership.
I thought that $16,000 for a $32,000 vehicle was still too much to pay. And that was an American made vehicle. American stuff doesnt hold its value, Gerry,
or rather very little of it does.
If you seriously believe that a Harley is some kind of
investment, then you are a financial idiot and do not deserve to handle any more money
than your mommy will give you as a weekly stipend or allowance. Better yet, why dont you send me your hard
earned money and I will keep it for you. Honest.
Im still shaking my head in utter dismay at your logic,
but let me get this idea of yours straight, Gerry.
You spend nineteen grand on a Harley Davidson motorcycle, and
you ride it for five years, rolling and racking up all those miles that you claim Harleys
are good for, putting wear and tear on all of the mechanical components and the frame, and
then you are going to turn around and sell it for nineteen grand again and you think you
came away doing well, that you somehow cheated the dealer, and that your money humped its
little brains out silly for you doing all the hard work while you did nothing but play?
Sorry, the truth is, you lost money big time in the deal which
you just described.
Holy odiferous troglodytes, Batman! How can that be?
Let me explain some basic high school economics to you.
Do you understand what nineteen grand, properly invested could
do for you in five short years? A lot more
than an outdated rattletrap piece of junk is going to do for you as an investment. This is just another common lie perpetuated by the
ignorant to make them feel better for getting bent over a stump by those scoglodytes from
Milwaukee and buggered silly until their eyes rattle around in their vacant skulls.
The great lie is that a Harley is an investment and a good
one at that.
The truth is, Harley is not a good investment, its a piss
poor investment and a rather flippant waste of good, hard earned money.
Hell, given the logic that you use, Gerry, a shoebox under my
bed is the same kind of great investment that a Harley is, only better, because I
dont have to buy tires, oil, filters, or gas for the money stored in the shoebox or
any fashion accessories to go with it. In five years, I can just reach into the
shoebox under my bed and get my nineteen thousand back out with no hassle whereas you have
to take the time to sell your Harley to someone to recoup your investment and
you are still out all the basic elements of upkeep, fuel, tag, and insurance. I dont have to buy any of that for the
shoebox. That and the shoebox wont leak
all over the carpet under my bed, I dont have to worry about having to trailer the
shoebox anywhere or spending hours polishing the chrome on it and when I open the shoebox
up at three in the morning, it doesnt annoy the hell out of my neighbors for two
blocks all around me.
Of course, like the Harley, the shoebox wouldnt have
actually made any real return on my investment, but at least it would have performed the
same, financially, if not physically, if not better, and I would have been able to get my
money back at any time, instead of having to go through the hassle of finding someone
dumber than me to take an outdated piece of crap off of my hands.
The import rider who paid less for his bike got the same style
of bike, more reliability, better performance, as good or better warranty, more
dependability, and used the rest of the money that he saved (when he didnt do like
the crowd did and buy a Harley) to purchase other things or invest his money and get a
better return on the money that he had left over. In
other words, he didnt pay for a trendy name like you did, he purchased a motorcycle,
a rather well made one, and he didnt have to pay extra for the emblems that were
stuck on it.
You really need to take a course in basic finance and economics,
Gerry, because you and apparently a lot of other misguided HD owners simply dont
know the first thing about money or economics. People
like you know that you have money, but you dont have the first clue on what to do
with it. I think someones had you, and
royally if you actually believe all of that financial garbage that you just spouted off to
me. Go ask a smart, successful investment
broker, or an educated, experienced banker, and see if they agree with your assessment of
Harley being a good investment. Theyll
laugh at you, or better yet, theyll take your nineteen grand, invest it for you,
keep the return it generates, and in five years, give you your original sum of money back. I myself will be glad to do this for you if you so
desire. Its the same concept as what you
are portraying.
Hell, for five years of interest on nineteen grand, I could
pretty much buy a brand new sportbike, standard, or cruiser and still not touch the
principle amount, just use the interest alone. Using
very, very fuzzy math, if you had $19,000, and you invested it for five years, at a return
of 5%, in five years, you would have over $5200 just in compound interest alone. A brand new GSX-R600 retails for about six grand,
less if you know how to haggle right (like I do). A
Honda Shadow is in that realm as well, give or take some haggling. The point is, for the interest alone on what a
Harley costs, I could buy an import bike without touching the principle. In other words, my money worked hard for me to buy
me a motorcycle, without losing anything in the process.
Thats a very low investment percentage, Gerry. I could do much better, so the profit would be a
lot higher on my return. So, in five years,
purchasing a Harley as an investment, you have really lost over five grand of
potential money, plus the cost of upkeep of fuel, oil, tires, fashion accessories, etc. Lets say that you spend, on average, fifty
dollars a month on gas, three hundred a year on tires, and about a hundred a year for oil,
plugs, filters, and other lubricants. Were
being very fuzzy here just to illustrate a ball-park figure.
All of that comes to a grand total of:
HARLEY |
COST |
purchase
price of original investment |
$19,000 |
potential
market interest lost on original investment |
$5200 |
gas,
$50 a month, times 60 months |
$3000 |
tires,
at $300 a year |
$1500 |
oil,
plugs, filters, lubricants, general |
$500 |
Grand total |
$29,200 |
Less original cost |
$19,000 |
You have spent |
-$10,200 |
Now, this is being very conservative in thinking and isnt
including the price of insurance or tag and title.
We're also assuming that you are paying a lump sum of cash for the bike, instead of
financing it which would add considerably to the amount of loss on your part through the
attrition of interest on your account. Fifty
dollars a month on gas is no where near what a real biker would spend, probably far less
but we're trying to not just go and blow the figures out of the water and send all of the
scoggins into shell shock so we'll keep the numbers nice and easy. Just riding around town and going to my job every
day I used to go through about eighty to a hundred dollars of gas a month, so if you
double the gas use / mileage, you can add another three grand to that total above, for a
whopping loss of over thirteen grand, or over two thirds of the original investment price
of your Harley. So, in reality, you lost
somewhere over ten grand for your great investment and possibly far more depending on your
style of riding and if you finance your purchase or not.
You will now say "But I've got all of my money
back at the end of 5 years and I got to ride a Harley for FREE!"
and I will say
"No, you are right back where you started five years ago,
only you are now over ten grand poorer with nothing to show for it other than maybe a few
tattoos."
Now, if you purchased that Harley above, and five years down the
road you sold it for $34,000, then it would have been a good investment because you would
have made back all of your initial money, all of your upkeep, and turned a profit at the
end above and beyond all of your costs. However, who is going to pay you $34,000 for
a 5 year old Harley with 100,000 miles on it when they can go and buy a brand new version
of that Harley, with zero miles, for $19,000? Only a fool, but then, you have to
look at what we are dealing with again, so it might be possible...
Heres another
big financial clue, Gerry.
An investment
generally doesnt require a lot of upkeep, and if it does, it doesnt require
almost a 50% influx of additional funds to keep it going.
An investment works for you, not eats up more of your money while doing so. An investment is a treasure, it is a tool for
storing away value and increasing that value. An investment isnt something
that you have to keep pumping money into in order for it to work for you. You can itemize those necessities all you want, but
no one is going to pay you for the tires, oil, filters, etc. that you use. I dont care how much genuine HD oil or
filters that you use. And were not even
counting in insurance, tag, tax, or title. That
is the cost of operation.
Investments generally
dont have to have insurance, tax, and title or a tag bought for them. They dont have a cost of operation involved
therefore a Harley can not be considered to be a good investment.
Does a Harley still
sound like a really good investment to you now, Gerry?
Not to me it doesnt, but then, I understand money, how hard it is to come by,
and how to spend it well while making it work for me.
Thats why Im not stupid with my money, and why I dont spend it on
stupid stuff, like overpriced, outdated fashion accessories thinly disguised as trendy
motorcycles.
The bottom line is
that a Harley is a ridiculous investment. Anyone
who thinks that a Harley is an investment is a not only a financial imbecile, but also an
idiot. Period.
There is a very real reason why the Harley logo is proudly displayed
on the tank and Honda and Yamaha to be absent from so many of theirs.
Yes, Gerry. That very real reason is an over the top, down your
throat and out your ass sideways brand identity saturation campaign. It is image overload and brand association forced
upon the weak minded and the criminally gullible in order to brain wash the simpletons of
our society into feeling the pseudo-patriotic guilt required to keep a bunch of scoggins
in new overalls and straw hats every few years or so.
The Harley logo is displayed on the gas tank so that you recognize this logo, this
emblem, and that the next time you are shopping for some mundane household item, you will
recognize this logo again. You will be pressed
to buy the HD version of toilet paper, of clocks, drinking glasses, tampons, antacid,
cologne, bottled drinking water, Christmas tree lights, or whatever the logo is currently
slathered on.
Harley wants you to
see their emblem because it is the only thing that they have going for them; image, and
that emblem represents the very core of what it means to own a Harley. You're not
riding a bike, you're riding a self-propelled logo and you are advertising for free while
paying out the ass for the privilege of doing that advertising.
Honda, Yamaha,
Suzuki, or Kawasaki, on the other hand, dont have to meet their bottom line and be
profitable by prostituting their image and whoring their logo on everything under the sun
like Harley Davidson seems only too happy to do. The
reason that so much rides on the Harley logo is that Harley has made that logo their main
selling point.
Harley is a logo, not
a motorcycle.
Honda is a
motorcycle, not a logo.
Big difference there.
Harley is worried
about what they can put their logo on next, while Honda is worrying about what kind of
technology is going to give them a solid foot against their competitors in the 21st
century.
Honda and Yamaha sell motorcycles (and cars, in the case of
Honda / Acura) and very GOOD ones. Harley
cant figure out motorcycles, dont hold your breath waiting on them to build a
car or truck, hell, they have to get Ford to build their version of a truck, just like
they have to get Porsche to build their only half way decent high performance engine. When it comes to anything other than making
officially licensed and endorsed accessories, T-shirts, stuffed animals, fashion wear, or
stamping out the same tired old design year after year, Harley Davidson doesnt have
the first fucking clue.
Why do Honda and Yamaha not put a big, flashy logo on the gas
tank? Simple.
Their name is their reputation, not their logo. Perhaps they dont want a symbol on the tank
because they are afraid that stupid people might think that their bikes are Harleys and that might hurt the image of their
bikes. After all, you mental plebeians seem to
think that Japan copied Harley in the design of their bikes.
I have a different theory. Japan
once again saw that America produced an inferior product that was expensive, outdated, and
overweight. Japan took the concept of Harley
Davidson, rebuilt it from the ground up, improved it in every way, and turned around and
sold it for less. The absence of a logo should
be taken as a sign of strength, Gerry. Honda
and Yamaha dont need to slather their logos on everything they can, because the
reputation of their product sells their product, not the size and shape of the logo. Its not that they are ashamed that they
dont carry the bar and shield logo on a particular type of motorcycle, its the
absence of the bar and shield logo which ultimately is the telling point, and which speaks
volumes that the motorcycle which lacks that redneck stamp of approval is ultimately the
better machine.
Nothing says redneck and white-trash
like the bar and shield logo, hence, Honda and Yamaha want no chance that their products
will be confused with the more plebian, sheep shagging domestic makes and models found on
this side of the pond.
All points which I thought would rather be obvious to someone of
your claimed intellect. After all, you
began this argument with the admission that you were looking for Harley emblems. Some companies can sell their products without
shoving their logo down the consumers throat or plastering it all over their
product.
Other companies simply cant.
Some companies let their products speak for their logo, rather
than their logo speak for their products.
Your representation of
Harley riders is a simple lie. Most Harley riders do not wear German helmets or nazi
symbols. I belong to a group of 650 plus and not one looks like this. You state they do as
a fact when you MUST know it to be untrue.
I state that Harley riders tend to
belong to huge groups because they are an army of dim-witted, identically dressed, deeply
confused, shallow-minded, pseudo-individual conformist twat-gits suffering from the mother
of all denials. They need the strength of huge
groups of like-dressed neural simpletons to tell them that they really do ride a real
motorcycle, to endorse their brand of commercialized, store-bought, corporate prostituted
life, and to patronize and praise their ability to flip through a catalog and dress
themselves in a conformal manner.
How many people do you think are in my group, Gerry?
Ill give you a hint, start counting on one hand, and stop
after you use the first finger.
I ride alone, because I am an individual. I dress like no one else around me, I ride a bike
that is unique to me, and I dont search for validation in the opinions of others nor
do I seek to join large groups of dimwits in the very real need to justify my existence
and / or my choices. You really do fit the
stereotype, dont you, Gerry.
Six hundred and fifty?
My God, thats a lot of fucking sheep! Did you all get sheared by Milwaukee at one time,
or in small groups? I guess what I'm curious to know is if you got some kind of
group discount for getting bent over a stump and reamed at the same time?
It's very disingenuous to call Harley riders every name
imaginable, (chimpanzee clits?), and then ask those that respond to your rants
to do so in a "civil" manner. Also, after using the phrase " half my brain
tied behind my back", you ask others to be more original in their
correspondence!
I really dont care if I step on any toes, Gerry. Ill get over it, rather quickly and I can
promise you I wont lose any sleep in the process.
Whether you do or not is your own personal problem. Too many people today try to make too many other
people happy and that is the inherent problem facing our nation, we have instituted zero
tolerance for intolerance. We are completely
intolerant of intolerance and fail to see the hypocrisy in all of this. I love it!
Ive made my stand, these are my guns, and Im
sticking to them. If you base your life around
an image, or a logo, or a corporation, then you deserve to be ridiculed until you cry. If you present false logic, blatantly erroneous
pretenses, and a host of other nonsense, I will shoot it down and hang you out to dry. Oh, and by civil manner, I mean that I
expect spirited, even heated arguments. You
can call me any name in the book that you want. However,
I do not expect people to send me stuff along the lines of :
Hey, asshole! I ride a Harlly and its the greateast bike in
the hole world and youre just jelus of that fact so suck my dik you dooshbag rice faggut. Ima gonna kill you dead with my tir iron if I ever
gets my Harley fixed and finds out where you lives, you dumbfuk sonufabitch homo gook
luvr.
And hell probably trailer his Harley down here as well
when he comes to look for me.
I get a lot of that kind of email, its just too easy to
respond to and I simply delete almost all of it after rolling around on the floor laughing
uncontrollably until my eyeballs liquefy and dribble out my ass.
Maybe I should rephrase that term from civil to read
somewhat educated. Would that
clear things up for you and those like you? I
thought that when dealing with the average Harley owner, using a term like somewhat
educated might be setting the bar and standard well out of their reach and might
scare them off.
And yes, I do ask for originality.
I lead by example. I
want someone to meet me at my level, and then surpass it.
I want to set a goal, have someone else break it, and then for that in turn
to give me a challenge to be even greater, to set a new bar to be judged by. It isnt that hard, if you exert a little
effort. Thats life in general, Gerry. I set the example, I move the bar higher. I hope others follow it and improve upon it. Its time we set the bar higher, and kept it
there, not lowered it for the losers in society so that they can pass and feel good about
themselves.
You seem to feel we are rather low in IQ. We may
have trouble handling your long sentences.
Most of you do, Gerry. Most of you do.
Anyone who likes Harley, NASCAR, and professional wrestling is not going to
be, by any stretch of the definition, a stalwart mental giant. The examples of Email which I post are the norm,
not the exception. And, you have to look at
what Im dealing with to begin with. Hell,
some of you are lucky to master the concept of fire, let alone something as advanced as
electricity. We wont even get into the discovery of basic personal hygiene
(which is apparently still lacking in most Harley circles).
And I've said it before and I'll say it
again, you can be the smartest or toughest sheep in the flock, Gerry,
but you are still a sheep.
Let's try something simple: Take the Mensa test available
on the internet. I'll trust your honesty in your response to me. It is 30 minutes
long. If you get about 20 of a possible 30 correct on that test you may
be eligible for Mensa membership. I turned down Mensa. Pompous types, you'd be at home
with them.
I took your test, 30 questions, 30 minutes. I had to use a sheet of scratch paper to do some of
the figuring but the rest of it was a lot less difficult than I imagined it would be, or
perhaps MENSA is itself overblown in its image, in which case it would be very similar to
Harley Davidson in that respect. I passed 28
out of 30 questions and thought them to be rather easy in their range of application. Two of the questions, the one involving finding the
word BANALITIES hidden inside the word INSATIABLE and the question
involving prime numbers were the two that I missed, and I probably spent the last eight
minutes on those two questions alone.
I have learned a new word!
Joy of joys! My mind
has expanded once again and will never return to the same shape it was when I awoke this
morning. Now I must find a way to sneak this
new word in my daily conversations with the dullard plebeians. Like I said before, the day
I stop learning is the day that they close the lid on my box.
Thank you for the opportunity and the challenge to take the
MENSA test. I had been meaning to do so for
sometime, out of curiosity, but just never got around to doing it. You finally provided the incentive to look it up
and take it. I cant say that I was
impressed. MENSA seems like another trendy
group to belong to, especially for smart people who probably spent their childhood getting
beaten up on playgrounds around the world and held upside down over the jungle gym until
their milk money fell out of their pockets. I
hope that the real MENSA entrance exam is far more challenging. Im not very impressed with what Ive
seen so far.
Would I join MENSA?
Probably not, but for different reasons that you state. I see MENSA as just another group, its kind
of like Sturgis, only for really smart people and just not as loud or stinky. MENSA is trendy.
Its another badge to wear to show that you belong to a large group of
similar minded people and that you arent a true individual who can stand on your
own. I dont need a certificate in a
frame or to pay dues to a group for someone else to tell me that Im smart or
educated or have the wisdom to be able to use my intelligence. I have a college degree, Bachelor of Science in
Business Administration. Thats enough
paper on the wall. I make my living building
and maintaining computer systems and networks, running my own department. I hold one of five positions at the very top in my
entire state. When Im not doing that,
Im either wearing a badge in my community, or Im pulling private security work
for patrons and clients. My wife is about to
earn her Masters degree and will then be working on her doctorate after that. Shes a math teacher, 8th grade
algebra with a certificate to teach high school advanced math as well. Once she finishes her Masters, she might try to
start teaching college level math and move on to teaching at a university. Her ultimate goal is administration, she wants to
be the principal of the school where she attended as a child, to give something back to
the community.
How about you, Gerry, how well did you score on the MENSA test? You obviously didnt do so well in the FINANCE
and BUSINESS section of the MENSA test, now did you? Fess
up.
If you get that far I can test you for the
International High IQ Society. Our membership is limited to the upper 5% IQ range. It
should be simple for you. I'm a simple Harley rider, yet, I can run instrumentation and
medical processes that most people could not guess at and am at the upper 3 % in IQ in
logic and problem solving. Considering your endless rant about the low IQ we Harley
owners possess, your capacities must be staggering.
Societies.
Groups.
Clubs.
Associations.
Flocks.
Herds.
Gaggles.
I simply must decline your offer to join yet another pasture of
bleating sheep, no matter how special you think that you all may be or how large your
craniums might measure in circumference with a tape ruler.
Im just not the kind of person who needs vast amounts of carbon copy
company in which to lose myself in and feel at home. I
seek out other individuals who are different than me, not ones who are the same. I seek new experiences, new points of views, total
difference, even exact opposites. I crave to
be different, to know people who are different than I am, and to stand alone, not to
follow the crowd. I want new stories, not just
rehashed versions of the same story.
Congratulations on the ability to run instrumentation and
medical process that most people could not begin to guess at. Most people couldnt fly a space capsule
either, but in the 1960s, NASA easily trained monkeys and other primates to do that
very task. These poor, scared shitless simians
were shot out into space and then managed to push enough buttons in the correct order to
return home again safely. The chimps usually
got a banana and a pat on the head at the end of the flight, all for a job well done. Im sure you as a human being get more far
more as compensation, though the jobs are probably almost identical and a monkey could be
trained to replace you at any given point in your career.
Im sorry, Gerry, but the ability to push buttons and read
dials was proven long ago to be a task that could be mastered by simple domesticated
simians. You could probably be replaced by a
well adapted, highly trained and only semi-house broken chimpanzee, in the worst case
scenario. And all they would have to do is pay
him in bananas. Im sure your salary
would buy a ton of ripe bananas and some clean drinking water as well as some newspaper to
line the bottom of your replacements cage. That
would in and of itself represent a considerable cost savings that could be realized on the
part of your employers. Hows that for
business economics?
Humans, on the other hand, are judged by the works that they
create, not the buttons that they push or the dials that they read. If you had actually created the equipment that you
brag about, instead of just operated it, then I might be impressed.
You speak of intellect, Gerry, but I learned a long time ago,
that there is a very real difference between common sense and book sense. Book sense will only get you so far in life, it may
allow you to score high on MENSA and other similar tests, to complete the crossword puzzle
in the New York Times newspaper, or to rack up a high score at trivial pursuit and be the
life of the party at a bunch of geeks, but the real test, that is, life itself, grades
upon a much harsher curve than any standardized form.
You can be the smartest person in the world, and still starve to death.
You and I appear to be very different.
The fact that you own a Harley, that you need large groups of
people to belong to in order to justify your existence, that you turned down MENSA because
you thought they were pompous asses while you claim to be in the top 3% of the intelligent
people in this world yet you cant even recognize basic finance and accounting
philosophy leads me to think that you are doing more than pulling my leg. I think you are shooting me a rather torrid stream
of tepid shit and Im just not buying it.
You might have more book sense than me, but I can assure you,
that a mixture of the two is far more preferable to a surplus of one over the other.
You have a big mouth. Back
it up. I await the first results. If you are correct, at all, in anything you
wrote, I have told my friends you must certainly test in the upper one per-cent, well
past me.
Once again, you require constant validation for your existence,
you need an official members card or a gold stamp of approval or more Harley emblems to be
who you think you are, to solidify and reinforce your perceived position in life. You require a piece of paper to wave in the air or
frame on the wall saying that you are intelligent, rather than people recognizing your
abilities on their own. You need a crutch to
hold you up, because you are too weak to stand on your own.
I particularly like the part of the MENSA test that asked:
Which of the following proverbs is closest in meaning to
the saying, "Birds of a feather, flock together."?
And the answer, of course, is "A man is known by the
company he keeps."
Enjoy your Harley, Gerry. With
650 like-minded sheep in your flock, I think that proverb applies to you rather aptly.
BACK